<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dual screen in Ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.emcken.dk/weblog/archives/198-dual-screen-in-ubuntu.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.emcken.dk/weblog/archives/198-dual-screen-in-ubuntu.html</link>
	<description>Time is always against me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 14:52:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Emcken</title>
		<link>http://www.emcken.dk/weblog/archives/198-dual-screen-in-ubuntu.html/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Emcken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emcken.dk/wp/archives/198-dual-screen-in-ubuntu.html#comment-177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi dimi3.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I might have had so called &quot;dead zones&quot;... but I think it was due to the fact that I was using screens with different resolutions. If its a bug or by design I don&#039;t know... I didn&#039;t feel the way it worked was a problem for me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;About the screenshot: I did have different resolutions but the screenshot application can&#039;t make screenshots in non-retangular shapes so it just use the background there... on the monitors that part just isn&#039;t visible.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t have this clear in mind because I haven&#039;t bothered with this in Ubuntu for a while now after the setup broke after an update. Anyways I&#039;m pretty sure that maximizing windows worked as it should (not using dead zone space,which you can also see in the screenshot where Firefox is maximized).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi dimi3.</p>

<p>I might have had so called &#8220;dead zones&#8221;&#8230; but I think it was due to the fact that I was using screens with different resolutions. If its a bug or by design I don&#8217;t know&#8230; I didn&#8217;t feel the way it worked was a problem for me.</p>

<p>About the screenshot: I did have different resolutions but the screenshot application can&#8217;t make screenshots in non-retangular shapes so it just use the background there&#8230; on the monitors that part just isn&#8217;t visible.</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t have this clear in mind because I haven&#8217;t bothered with this in Ubuntu for a while now after the setup broke after an update. Anyways I&#8217;m pretty sure that maximizing windows worked as it should (not using dead zone space,which you can also see in the screenshot where Firefox is maximized).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dimi3</title>
		<link>http://www.emcken.dk/weblog/archives/198-dual-screen-in-ubuntu.html/comment-page-1#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>dimi3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emcken.dk/wp/archives/198-dual-screen-in-ubuntu.html#comment-175</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jacob,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wonder do you have &#039;dead zones&#039; like areas where you can drag something but you can&#039;t see it on the display with the lower resolution. Because I read some articles that had this problem.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;From your screenshot I didn&#039;t understand if your displays are with different resoulution - why does the second one (with firefox on it) has the same Vertical Resolution as the first one?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jacob,</p>

<p>I wonder do you have &#8216;dead zones&#8217; like areas where you can drag something but you can&#8217;t see it on the display with the lower resolution. Because I read some articles that had this problem.</p>

<p>From your screenshot I didn&#8217;t understand if your displays are with different resoulution &#8211; why does the second one (with firefox on it) has the same Vertical Resolution as the first one?</p>

<p>Regards.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dimi3</title>
		<link>http://www.emcken.dk/weblog/archives/198-dual-screen-in-ubuntu.html/comment-page-1#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>dimi3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 07:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://emcken.dk/wp/archives/198-dual-screen-in-ubuntu.html#comment-174</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jacob,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have an ATI card, but after your how-to I think I&#039;ll by a nVidia one - maybe FX 1100 second hand. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In my setup I have one monitor with resolution 1680x1050 and a second LCD TV with resolution 1360x768. I noticed that you have different resolutions on both displays and I have only one question - do you have any &#039;dead zones&#039; on the displays (sections that are not visible on the monitor but you can drag something in them). &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jacob,</p>

<p>I have an ATI card, but after your how-to I think I&#8217;ll by a nVidia one &#8211; maybe FX 1100 second hand. </p>

<p>In my setup I have one monitor with resolution 1680&#215;1050 and a second LCD TV with resolution 1360&#215;768. I noticed that you have different resolutions on both displays and I have only one question &#8211; do you have any &#8216;dead zones&#8217; on the displays (sections that are not visible on the monitor but you can drag something in them). </p>

<p>Regards <img src='http://www.emcken.dk/weblog/wp-content/plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
